From previous discussions on the mailing list [1], there are two
scenarios here :
* Users interested in only checking out specific Tuscany sub-projects and be able to build it and work with it. These users would rely on all dependencies to be available from a maven repo (e.g SDO and DAS, among external dependencies) * Users interested in all Tuscany, they would come and build from the root, and would expect the trunk version of SCA, SDO and DAS to build and work together. So, maybe we could try to have both scenarios automated, instead of deciding for one, as I was proposing in the original question. As for the downloading, I wasn't planning to publish any jars from the nightly build, at least for now... but if people think we should do it, I can look into it as well. [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg17979.html On 5/29/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote: > I pretty much have it working locally, building SCA, SDO and DAS > independently. > > As for hosting the build at the shared machine at Apache, I have > created a JIRA [1] asking for an account to add and administer the > builds on the shared machine. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1261 > > On 5/26/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Thanks for doing this :). +1 for separating out SCA, SDO and DAS builds >> >> - Venkat >> >> On 5/23/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > I'm starting to pursue a nightly build for Apache Tuscany with the >> > Apache Infra guys, and I just want to double check what people think >> > it's the best build layout that we should use >> > >> > - Have one top-down build, that would build all Tuscany subprojects >> > (SCA/SDO/DAS) >> > >> > - Have three builds, that would build each project separately >> > >> > I particularly would prefer the second option, as that would ensure >> > each subproject can work independently, based on published >> > releases/snapshots of it's dependencies. >> > >> > Thoughts ? >> > >> > -- >> > Luciano Resende >> > Apache Tuscany Committer >> > http://people.apache.org/~lresende >> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> > > Nice. Quick question, as it looks like you're going to have 3 different builds for SCA, SDO and DAS: If I download the SCA and SDO builds for example, will the SCA build use the exact same level of SDO that I'll get with the SDO build? In other words are we making sure that they work together? Thanks -- Jean-Sebastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
