ant elder wrote:
The last comments have been in favour of keeping things as-is so how about
just doing nothing and letting this thread die.
...ant
Here are the last comments from the different people who contributed to
this thread:
- Mike, http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg21059.html
- Luciano,
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg21068.html
- Simon, http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg21106.html
- Sebastien,
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg21113.html
- Ant, http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg21117.html
I don't see a consensus in favor of keeping things as-is in these comments.
This has a significant impact on the programming model so IMO this JIRA
issue needs a clear resolution.
On 8/19/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On 8/3/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ant elder wrote:
Taking that line of thought and you hit the long thread associated
with:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200701.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
which is what I was hoping to quietly ignore by just keeping
everything
in
the one SCA namespace.
...ant
On 8/3/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wouldn't this cause breakage in the scenario that I described, where
<foo> from Tuscany later turns into <foo> as part of SCA but with
some
differences? Any SCDLs written to just use plain <foo> would break
when Tuscany steps up to support the SCA <foo>.
Simon
ant elder wrote:
How about having the Tuscany namespace extend the SCA one so you can
choose
to use that as the default namespace so as to avoid having to worry
about
all the namespace prefixes?
...ant
I don't really expect to win this debate now that the issue has been
brought
up, had just been hoping it wouldn't come up :)
I didn't really want to reopen this debate either but I didn't
understand both of your last comments so I guess I'm going to have to
ask some questions...
Ant, what did you mean by "having the Tuscany namespace extend the SCA
one?"
I'm not actually sure, my xsd is a bit rusty, i vaguely thought there
was a
way to say something extend another namespace inheriting all the things
from
it, but a quick search for it now i cant find how to do that, is it not
possible?
<snip>
And also give my opinion:
+0.5 if people want to keep Tuscany extensions in the SCA namespace for
now, hoping that they make it to the SCA spec XSDs at some point
I'd be +1 on doing that. The easier we can make things for people trying
out
Tuscany the better IHMO.
...ant
What's the conclusion here? I've seen different opinions from Mike,
Simon, Luciano, Ant, myself. Do we need a vote to decide the next step?
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
