Simon Nash wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On 9/12/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(cut)
I don't think we have more than one node or domain concept. These words
are used elsewhere many times (outside of Tuscany) and it could be
useful to
ensure that people understand that we are talking about the Tuscany
concept
of Node and Domain rather than anyone else's. The code at the moment
uses
Node and Domain. I raised the question as I felt there was scope for
confusion. I'm now thinking that the SCA prefix is too loose (and not
applicable in the Node code) so maybe TuscanyNode/TuscanyDomain would
fit
the bill?
I think this is better. I would see the TuscanyDomain as Tuscany's
implementation of SCA's Domain concept. In that correct?
Simon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So I thought a little bit more about that and I think I prefer:
org.apache.tuscany.sca.Domain
instead of:
org.apache.tuscany.sca.SCADomain
or org.apache.tuscany.sca.TuscanyDomain.
This is similar to:
org.osoa.sca.ComponentContext
org.osoa.sca.ServiceReference
commonj.sdo.DataObject
which are not named:
org.osoa.sca.SCAComponentContext
org.osoa.sca.SCAServiceReference
commonj.sdo.SDODataObject
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
