On 9/22/07, Joseph, Roshan IN BLR SISL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I believe the JMS binding is not included in the latest release and if > it is due to bugs, I would like to contribute in making it work. Can > someone point to the issues in JMS binding or let me know the current > status of it. > > > > Any help in this regard will be really helpful, as I would like to > utilize the binding for my prototype which I am making > > > > Thanks > > Roshan > > > > > > Important notice:This e-mail and any attachment thereto contains corporate > proprietary information. If you have received it by mistake, please notify > us immediately by reply e-mail and delete this e-mail and its attachments > from your system. Thank You. > Hi Roshan
You are right, the JMS binding is not included in the latest release. Someone else has just asked about it's status ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1789). Basically the JMS binding got to a stage where it supported request/response type message patterns but not the full asynchronous model you might expect (see the unit tests included with the binding). It does run currently and it's included in the build so if you check the latest Java SCA code out of trunk you can play with it. I note, looking at SVN, that there have been a few changes over the last month or so, including a new implementation of the jms binding model. Your help would be very much appreciate in improving the JMS binding. Shall we start making a list here of the things that need to be done? Something that springs to mind just having had a brief refresh of the code is 1/ move the model information from o.a.t.s.binding.jms.impl.JMSBinding to the new model classes under o.a.t.s.binding.jms Regards Simon
