On 10/1/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ant elder wrote: > > On 9/27/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > 5 - On ongoing OSOA work. Assuming that there is ongoing work and that > the > > > >> mode of operation is unchanged, maybe we wait until it reaches OASIS. > >> > > > > > > Thats the one i was mainly thinking about. > > > > "wait until it reaches OASIS" is one option but it doesn't seem ideal as > it > > means it could take quite some time before Tuscany can implement some of > the > > new features. > > > > The other end of the spectrum is to say we fine with the OSOA way of > "OSOA > > provides means for providing feedback and means for joining as a > supporter > > for access to some non-public materials", that doesn't seem ideal to me > > either as it doesn't seem right for an Apache project to be implementing > > something where only a select group have access to the design docs. > > > > I don't know the answer, I think the main thing is we've shown we > understand > > the issue, have reached some consensus, and are clear about whats > happening. > > I'd be more comfortable with Tuscany only implementing OSOA things when > > there's a draft published publicly, but even that isn't perfect as it > takes > > sometime for drafts to get published publicly (lets hope there's an > example > > of this imminently). > > > > What do others think? > > > > ...ant > > > > > > My 2c: > > - Work on OSOA public drafts. > > - Push OSOA to publish drafts quickly when the Tuscany user+developer > community is asking for it (a draft of a transaction policy just got > published for example [1], I hope we can get implemented in Tuscany soon > as several users have been asking for transaction support). > > - Work on ongoing OASIS work as it's public. > > Thoughts? > > [1] > > http://www.osoa.org/download/attachments/35/SCA_TransactionPolicy_V051b.pdf
That all sounds good to me (assuming that means no work in Tuscany on OSOA things that are not public, which is what you mean right?) ...ant
