Same here.

On 10/8/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Works for me now, thanks!
>
>   ...ant
>
> On 10/8/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Fixed under r582882.  The sample is now going ok for me.  Could you also
> > try, please ?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > - Venkat
> >
> > On 10/8/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes.  I too see this and am right now fixing it.  Regret the
> > > inconvenience.
> > >
> > > - Venkat
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/8/07, Ignacio Silva-Lepe < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I am seeing this from a mvn clean ; mvn on
> > > > r582825
> > > >
> > > > On 10/8/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I've been getting a build fail in helloworld-ws-reference-secure
> for
> > a
> > > > > while
> > > > > now with the error below, does anyone else see this?
> > > > >
> > > > > Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
> > 10.703sec
> > > > > <<< FAILURE!
> > > > > testEmbeddedReferenceClient(helloworld.HelloWorldClientTestCase
> > )  Time
> > > > > elapsed: 2.859 sec  <<< ERROR!
> > > > > java.lang.reflect.UndeclaredThrowableException
> > > > > Caused by: org.apache.tuscany.sca.interfacedef.util.FaultException
> :
> > > > > WSDoAllReceiver: Incoming message does not contain required
> Security
> > > > > header
> > > > >        at
> > > > > org.apache.tuscany.sca.binding.ws.axis2.Axis2BindingInvoker.invoke
> (
> > > > > Axis2BindingInvoker.java:79)
> > > > >        at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> org.apache.tuscany.sca.core.databinding.wire.DataTransformationInterceptor.invoke
> > > > > (DataTransformationInterceptor.java:73)
> > > > >        at
> > > > > org.apache.tuscany.sca.core.invocation.JDKInvocationHandler.invoke
> (
> > > > > JDKInvocationHandler.java:233)
> > > > >        at
> > > > > org.apache.tuscany.sca.core.invocation.JDKInvocationHandler.invoke(
> > > > > JDKInvocationHandler.java:130)
> > > > >        ... 36 more
> > > > >
> > > > >   ...ant
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to