On 10/13/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> Ant,
>
> Are there any issues that should be pointed out, such as the (hopefully)
> mechanical licensing header issue in stdcxx, or community diversity, which
> at least in part is measuring independence from corporate backing (a
> popular
> thread this past month)?  It seems that the latter should be well in hand,
> but I'll not assume.  :-)
>
>         --- Noel


Tuscany has no legal or licensing issues that I'm aware of. RAT has been run
numerous times over all the releases we've done, and the code scrutinized in
lots of release reviews (and from all those release review comments the
Tuscany ppmc have a learnt lots about the Apache release requirements). The
biggest recent issue was when a dependency on bouncycastle got added but
we've removed that for now till the IDEA patent issues are resolved.

There were 11 committers when the Tuscany poddling was first created and
over the course of incubation 19 new committers have been added giving a
diversity of something like 5 or 6 different companies and several
independents. Not all of those are currently active, and a couple probably
wont ever be again, but others may become active again from time to time
depending on their own needs and uses of Tuscany. There does still remain at
least the minimum of three legally independent committers, and the with so
many new committers being voted in over incubation it shows Tuscany is
completely open to accepting new people.

   ...ant

Reply via email to