Hi, Lucaino: I tried more, and I noticed that to make JSONObject->pojo work, I need to annote the service interface as @Remoteable.
The actual transform happens as: JSONObject->JSON2XMLStreamReader->XMLStreamReader->XML2JavaBeanTransformer->pojo So inside this chain, I don't care what the xml is. But unfortrunately, result of this transformation doesn't meed saitisfaction. Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There is a thread discussion Databinding transformation from/to Pojo. I guess that threats the same issue you are reporting, and binding-json will support this scenario once the databinding framework is enhanced. [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg25781.html On Nov 19, 2007 6:35 PM, shaoguang geng wrote: > Hello, every one: > > The binding-json (trunk) runs fine, but there is a very important thing I > found: > > The test case uses a primary type as the input type. > > But if I use a custom type pojo, the Object got no transform! > > This is a very very thing need our attention. Is there any point over this? > > I expect words from any of you. Thanks. > > > --------------------------------- > Be a better sports nut! Let your teams follow you with Yahoo Mobile. Try it > now. -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------- Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. Make Yahoo! your homepage.
