Hey, not at all. Its actually my bad. It would not have happened if I had used a constant there instead of the string literal :). That's fixed now.
- Venkat On Nov 21, 2007 2:20 PM, Rajini Sivaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Venkat, > > Sorry about that. The service filename had changed between the time I > started implementing the classloader changes and submitted the patch. I > should have been more careful when merging the changes. > > > Thank you... > > Regards, > > Rajini > > > On 11/21/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Ok, I figured this out. There's been a change in the name of the > services > > file that used to contain the Policy hanlders. > > > > Thanks > > > > - Venkat > > > > On Nov 20, 2007 9:19 PM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > With the recent 'classloader' changes the enhancements that I'd did in > > the > > > the calculator sample to demonstrate the use of implementation > policies > > does > > > not seem to work anymore. Its primarily to do with the loading of > > > PolicyHandler class names from > > > META-INF/services/org.apache.tuscany.sca.policy.PolicySetHandlers file > > in > > > the implementation-java-runtime module. Earlier I used to load this > > file > > > from the JavaImplementationProvider.loadPolicyHandlers using the TCCL. > > > After the classloader related clean up the 'loadPolicyHandler' method > > now > > > uses ServiceDiscovery.getServiceResources and I see that the file > > doesn't > > > seem to get loaded. Can somebody point to that which I am missing > here > > ? > > > Thanks. > > > > > > - Venkat > > > > > >
