On Feb 3, 2008 7:49 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip> > One thing looking at those Spring downloads is that i think they're more > > comaprable to out SCA, SDO, and DAS downloads. > > I don't understand why you're saying that. I was following a scheme > similar to Spring in my proposal. > > - tuscany-core - Spring core framework > - tuscany-web - Spring web flow / Spring Web services > - tuscany-process - Spring integration > What I was trying to say is that I don't think the Spring Framework does map to only our tuscany-core as the Spring Framework also includes support for all those other things i listed out before (ws, scripting,...), so following the Spring model the tuscany-core, web, and process would be included in the one distribution. The other Spring downloads are for completely separate projects with separate release cycles just as our SDO and DAS projects are, for example, Spring Web services is a complete WS stack comparable to Axis2 or CXF. ...ant
