Hmm... seems like I am missing something then... alright let me ask you this
way...
if SCADefintions is going to contain a list of JMSBinding definitions..
won't in end up something like this...
public interface SCADefinitions {
List<Intent> getPolicyIntents();
List<JMSBinding> getJmsBindingDefs();
...
}
Now to get the class 'JMSBinding' mustn't the definitions module include the
binding-jms module as dependency ?
- Venkat
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> > Hi Sebastien,
> >
> > If the SCADefinitions model must hold jms binding definitions, I guess
> it
> > must add the jms binding as a dependency.
>
> Good news, it doesn't need to :)
>
> This is similar to the assembly model holding JMS binding definitions
> for example, without having a dependency on the JMS binding.
>
> Or am I missing something?
> --
> Jean-Sebastien
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
