Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
Thanks for volunteering !
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
> I'm adding back the Feed binding to the distribution as there is
still
> one sample that uses rome atom/rss binding.
>
I can fix the sample to use the new binding if that helps. Having both
the old and new bindings is likely to cause confusion, as people will
not know which one gets picked.
--
Jean-Sebastien
OK I'll do it this morning.
I'm also in the middle of bringing-up the Eclipse plugin build and
launcher, and running into issues with JARs missing I think and also
issues communicating between the plugin and the SCA node, but I expect
to fix it in the next few hours this morning too.
Well, the morning extended to the afternoon :), I managed to bring up
the eclipse plugin and launcher but am still working on removing the
dependencies on the old Rome-based feed binding, as several demo modules
are still using it in addition to the two feed-aggregator samples.
In SVN revisions r639931 (trunk) and r639933 (1.2 branch) the samples
and demos that were using the old feed binding have been ported to the
new atom-abdera and rss-rome bindings.
I had to fix the following issues:
- In the ATOM binding invoker, remove the calls to close client HTTP
connections as Abdera does lazy parsing (requiring an open connection).
- Change the feed-aggregator sample to use spec-compliant ATOM feeds as
the old ones were making Abdera unhappy (Abdera seems to be more strict
than Rome when parsing feeds).
I also had to workaround a more serious issue with SCA reference
injection, I'll post about it in a new thread.
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
