On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 12:40 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip> > Here's what I imagined we'd do: > 1. add OSGi entries to each of our JAR manifests > 2. have developers maintain them and pay attention to imports/exports > 3. use the OSGi build to detect API and SPI import/export violations > 4. find the best way to OSGi-enable 3rd party dependency JARs > > I realize that my suggestion [1] is not very popular and most people on > this list would prefer to come up with bigger bundles grouping several of > our JARs/modules. I don't think that the 'bigger aggregate bundle' approach > will work, but I'll be happy to watch people try it :) if they want to. > Perfectly ok but would you say a bit more about why you don't think the bigger aggregate bundle approach will work? I like the sound of less bundles as it seems like it could be easier to use but if you know of issues it would be nice to hear them now. ...ant
