OK, I think I have everything I need now to respin this RC. I'm inclined
to take the opportunity to remove the "incubating" tag on this release
whilst I'm fixing up the poms.
Kelvin.
2008/6/3 ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> That sounds right to me.
>
> ...ant
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:57 AM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Just a thought, would I be right in guessing that if ever our
> > SdoBundleActivator is touched in the runtime, then the environment would
> > be
> > expected to provide the classes to satisfy
> >
> > import org.osgi.framework.BundleActivator;
> > import org.osgi.framework.BundleContext;
> >
> > ?
> >
> > in which case I think declaring a "provided" scope for the felix
> dependency
> > would be the right way to do things
> >
> > Kelvin.
> >
> > 2008/6/3 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > Thanks Ant, that looks like progress, but the felix framework jar is
> > now
> > > not in the list of distributed jars.
> > >
> > > Kelvin.
> > >
> > > 2008/6/3 ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > Adding an exclude for felix to the distribution pom can fix that, eg
> > here's
> > >> local changes i have just tried:
> > >>
> > >> Index: src/main/assembly/bin.xml
> > >> ===================================================================
> > >> --- src/main/assembly/bin.xml (revision 662488)
> > >> +++ src/main/assembly/bin.xml (working copy)
> > >> @@ -120,13 +120,13 @@
> > >> <dependencySets>
> > >> <dependencySet>
> > >>
> > >> <outputDirectory>tuscany-sdo-${sdo.version}/lib</outputDirectory>
> > >> - <includes>
> > >> -
> > >> <include>org.apache.tuscany.sdo:tuscany-sdo-api-r2.1</include>
> > >> + <!-- includes>
> > >> +
> > >> <include>org.apache.tuscany.sdo:tuscany-sdo-api-r2.1</include>
> > >>
> > <include>org.apache.tuscany.sdo:tuscany-sdo-lib</include>
> > >>
> > <include>org.apache.tuscany.sdo:tuscany-sdo-impl</include>
> > >>
> > >> <include>org.apache.tuscany.sdo:tuscany-sdo-tools</include>
> > >> <include>org.apache.tuscany.sdo:sample-sdo</include>
> > >> - </includes>
> > >> + </includes -->
> > >> <fileMode>0644</fileMode>
> > >> </dependencySet>
> > >>
> > >> Index: pom.xml
> > >> ===================================================================
> > >> --- pom.xml (revision 662488)
> > >> +++ pom.xml (working copy)
> > >> @@ -56,6 +56,12 @@
> > >> <groupId>org.apache.tuscany.sdo</groupId>
> > >> <artifactId>tuscany-sdo-impl</artifactId>
> > >> <version>${pom.version}</version>
> > >> + <exclusions>
> > >> + <exclusion>
> > >> + <groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId>
> > >> + <artifactId>org.apache.felix.main</artifactId>
> > >> + </exclusion>
> > >> + </exclusions>
> > >> </dependency>
> > >> <dependency>
> > >> <groupId>org.apache.tuscany.sdo</groupId>
> > >> @@ -67,6 +73,7 @@
> > >> <artifactId>sample-sdo</artifactId>
> > >> <version>${pom.version}</version>
> > >> </dependency>
> > >> +
> > >> </dependencies>
> > >>
> > >> <build>
> > >>
> > >> Which results in a lib directory containing:
> > >>
> > >> backport-util-concurrent-3.0.jar
> > >> codegen-2.2.3.jar
> > >> codegen-ecore-2.2.3.jar
> > >> common-2.2.3.jar
> > >> ecore-2.2.3.jar
> > >> ecore-change-2.2.3.jar
> > >> ecore-xmi-2.2.3.jar
> > >> sample-sdo-1.1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
> > >> stax-api-1.0.1.jar
> > >> tuscany-sdo-api-r2.1-1.1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
> > >> tuscany-sdo-impl-1.1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
> > >> tuscany-sdo-lib-1.1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
> > >> tuscany-sdo-tools-1.1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
> > >> wstx-asl-3.2.1.jar
> > >> xsd-2.2.3.jar
> > >>
> > >> ...ant
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:31 AM, kelvin goodson <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > I had an offline chat with Rajini. It seems we need just the
> > framework
> > >> jar
> > >> > of felix in the distro, but if the dependency on felix is declared
> as
> > >> test
> > >> > scope in the pom, then that jar is not available to main phase of
> the
> > >> > build. If its not declared as test scope then we get 5 felix jars
> in
> > >> the
> > >> > binary distro. Rajini's going to take a look when she gets some
> time.
> > >> >
> > >> > Kelvin.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > 2008/6/3 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >> >
> > >> >> The felix jars were introduced in the fix for "SDO does not work
> > with
> > >> >> OSGi" [1] in commit 620763 [2]. I don't know if this is expected
> > >> >> behaviour, not being an OSGI expert. Comments anyone?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Kelvin.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293
> > >> >> [2] http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=620763
> > >> >>
> > >> >> 2008/6/3 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> The required libraries are
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> sample-sdo-%RELEASE%.jar
> > >> >>> sdo-api-r2.1-%RELEASE%.jar
> > >> >>> tuscany-sdo-lib-%RELEASE%.jar
> > >> >>> tuscany-sdo-impl-%RELEASE%.jar
> > >> >>> tuscany-sdo-tools-%RELEASE%.jar
> > >> >>> codegen-ecore-2.2.3.jar
> > >> >>> codegen-2.2.3.jar
> > >> >>> ecore-2.2.3.jar
> > >> >>> ecore-change-2.2.3.jar
> > >> >>> ecore-xmi-2.2.3.jar
> > >> >>> common-2.2.3.jar
> > >> >>> xsd-2.2.3.jar
> > >> >>> stax-api-1.0.1.jar
> > >> >>> wstx-asl-3.2.0.jar
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> with
> > >> >>> backport-util-concurrent being optional if you want threadsafe
> > >> >>> collections with Java 1.4 IIRC
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> The felix jar inclusions were introduced some time between commit
> > >> level
> > >> >>> 600913 and 627754; I'm working on narrowing this down at the
> > moment.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Kelvin.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> 2008/6/2 ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> It is strange.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Removing the <includes> at the bottom of the assembly bin.xml
> > changes
> > >> it
> > >> >>>> so
> > >> >>>> that the dependencies do get included again, but several felix
> > >> >>>> dependencies
> > >> >>>> also get dragged in. What is the complete list of jars that
> should
> > be
> > >> >>>> included?
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> ...ant
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:02 PM, kelvin goodson <
> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> >>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> > This failure also occurs with the 2.1 version and the
> 2.2-beta-1
> > >> >>>> version.
> > >> >>>> > The current trunk version is 2.2-beta-3-SNAPSHOT, which I
> > haven't
> > >> >>>> found in
> > >> >>>> > a repository yet, so the only version that seems ever to have
> > >> worked
> > >> >>>> is
> > >> >>>> > the
> > >> >>>> > 2.2-SNAPSHOT version. I have taken a look at the assembly
> plugin
> > >> >>>> JIRAs,
> > >> >>>> > but
> > >> >>>> > it's hard to trawl that since so many JIRAs reference the word
> > >> >>>> dependency.
> > >> >>>> > It's not clear to me whether we benefited from a freak bug that
> > was
> > >> to
> > >> >>>> our
> > >> >>>> > advantage in the 2.2-SNAPSHOT version or whether all the other
> > >> >>>> versions
> > >> >>>> > have
> > >> >>>> > a bug/bugs.
> > >> >>>> >
> > >> >>>> > Kelvin.
> > >> >>>> >
> > >> >>>> > 2008/6/2 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >> >>>> >
> > >> >>>> > > I have pinned down the change that caused the absence of EMF
> > jars
> > >> in
> > >> >>>> the
> > >> >>>> > > distribution zip to be the switch from the maven assembly
> > plugin
> > >> >>>> version
> > >> >>>> > > 2.2-SNAPSHOT to the 2.2-beta-2 as altered here [1]. I hope
> > to
> > >> >>>> look at
> > >> >>>> > > this again soon, but have to stop for now. If anyone has
> any
> > >> views
> > >> >>>> on
> > >> >>>> > what
> > >> >>>> > > version we should be using please pipe up.
> > >> >>>> > >
> > >> >>>> > > Kelvin.
> > >> >>>> > >
> > >> >>>> > > [1]
> > >> >>>> > >
> > >> >>>> >
> > >> >>>>
> > >>
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml?r1=628691&r2=642349&pathrev=642349&diff_format=h
> > >> >>>> > >
> > >> >>>> > > Kelvin.
> > >> >>>> > >
> > >> >>>> > > 2008/5/19 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >> >>>> > >
> > >> >>>> > > I'm looking at fixing a problem wrt running the samples at
> the
> > >> >>>> moment.
> > >> >>>> > >>
> > >> >>>> > >> Also, I found that with a combination of using IBM JDK 1.5
> and
> > >> >>>> maven
> > >> >>>> > 2.0.7
> > >> >>>> > >> I got hit by
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-135when
> > >> >>>> trying
> > >> >>>> > to
> > >> >>>> > >> build from the top. We say in our BUILDING doc that 2.0.7
> is
> > >> OK,
> > >> >>>> > perhaps
> > >> >>>> > >> if we need to respin we should raise that in order to avoid
> > IBM
> > >> JDK
> > >> >>>> > users
> > >> >>>> > >> hitting this issue. It's fine with 2.0.9
> > >> >>>> > >>
> > >> >>>> > >> Kelvin.
> > >> >>>> > >>
> > >> >>>> > >>
> > >> >>>> > >> 2008/5/18 ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >> >>>> > >>
> > >> >>>> > >> Please review and vote on the SDO 1.1.1 release.
> > >> >>>> > >>>
> > >> >>>> > >>> The artifacts including binary and source distributions,
> > >> staging
> > >> >>>> maven
> > >> >>>> > >>> repo
> > >> >>>> > >>> and release notes are available at
> > >> >>>> > >>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/>
> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/>
> > >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/>
> > >> >>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/>
> > >> >>>> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/>
> > >> >>>> > >>> <
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/
> > >.
> > >> >>>> > >>> The only difference between this and the 1.1 release is the
> > fix
> > >> >>>> for
> > >> >>>> > >>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2240.
> > >> >>>> > >>>
> > >> >>>> > >>> +1 from me.
> > >> >>>> > >>>
> > >> >>>> > >>> ...ant
> > >> >>>> > >>>
> > >> >>>> > >>
> > >> >>>> > >>
> > >> >>>> > >
> > >> >>>> >
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
