On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Mike Edwards wrote: > > > >> Simon Laws wrote: > >> > >>> It's been a little while now since we did our 1.2 release. Since then > >>> there > >>> has been lots of activity and of course we have graduated. It feels > like > >>> the > >>> right time to do a 1.3 release. Looking back at the mail list over the > >>> last > >>> couple of months there are quite a few candidates for inclusion that I > >>> can > >>> see; > >>> > >>> Better BPEL support > >>> Improvements to the domain manager app > >>> Improved runtime Java2WSDL processing > >>> Support for validation monitoring > >>> Databinding improvements > >>> Performance improvements > >>> JSR250 annotation support > >>> OSGi support improvements and a simple OSGi runtime test > >>> Java 2 security enablement > >>> Quite a few more tests for various parts of the runtime > >>> Lots of JIRA fixes. > >>> and of course we can remove the "incubating" assignment and drum up a > bit > >>> of > >>> publicity for our TLP graduation > >>> > >>> I'd also like to have a bit of a tidy up for this release and remove > the > >>> old > >>> domain modules we are no longer using (I'll post on this separately) > >>> > >>> What else has been added or changed? > >>> > >>> I think the things I would like to get done can be closed off next week > >>> ready to cut a branch. > >>> > >>> Thoughts? > >>> > >>> Simon > >>> > >>> Yes, I give a +1. > >> > >> BPEL is looking a lot better now. I'd like to add a couple of more > >> sophisticated itests/samples as well and the release will be a good > spur. > >> > >> > >> Yours, Mike. > >> > >> I think this is a good time to do a 1.3 release. This would make > > the new runtime Java2WSDL generation available to Tuscany users, > > and resolve a number of issues with the previous code generation > > that used Axis2. The other improvements listed are valuable as well. > > > > Simon > > > > > OK, so it looks like people want to do this > > Re. Luciano's question about RM. I'll volunteer to be RM this time round > and > all help is greatly appreciated. If though Luciano (or anyone else for that > matter) you are keen to RM this time then I won't fight you for it;-) Would > seem a little unfair though as you did the last one. > > Anyone have things they are working one that would stop us moving forward > with this and cutting the R1.3 branch at the end of this week? > > Regards > > Simon > +1 to Simon as RM and taking the branch at the end of this week. ...ant
