Folks,

I notice a number of JIRA issues raised against the SDO C++ implementation that have the smell of being specification issues rather than implementation issues.

If the issues really do imply changing or extending the specification of SDO for C++, then I believe that the issues should rightly be raised against the specification itself (the spec group have their own infrastructure and email lists).

I'm OK with having "tracker" issues raised in the Tuscany project which point to issues raised with the specs, but it must be clear that any changes to the specs must ultimately be made by the specification teams.


Yours,  Mike.

Reply via email to