Folks,
I notice a number of JIRA issues raised against the SDO C++
implementation that have the smell of being specification issues rather
than implementation issues.
If the issues really do imply changing or extending the specification of
SDO for C++, then I believe that the issues should rightly be raised
against the specification itself (the spec group have their own
infrastructure and email lists).
I'm OK with having "tracker" issues raised in the Tuscany project which
point to issues raised with the specs, but it must be clear that any
changes to the specs must ultimately be made by the specification teams.
Yours, Mike.
- [SDO C++] JIRA Issues: Specification or Implementation con... Mike Edwards
-