My recollection - Frank let me know if this is incorrect - was that
the SDO impl would not necessarily be "EMF-free" but that it would
hide implementation details. For the Java runtime, the goal was to be
"EMF-free" from the perspective that the runtime would not contain
direct dependencies on it.
Jim
On Mar 22, 2006, at 1:15 AM, ant elder wrote:
On 3/21/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip/>
We have been working to remove the dependencies on EMF
Is a goal to have an EMF free SDO impl? One of the reasons I liked
this STaX
based approach is it makes the Tuscany core look more lightweight, but
removing the EMF dependency could also help there.
...ant
