Ant,
Do you want to outline some things you think are important too? I
didn't list anything specific b/c I don't have any firm opinions.
Jim
On Mar 22, 2006, at 3:31 PM, ant elder wrote:
Are there any _specific_ items people could suggest to improve the WS
support for this upcoming release? The next steps thread from a
while back
was pretty quiet.
Axis2 already supports most things and interop's well so its 'just'
a mater
of integration with Tuscany. Attachments? raw doc style? headers?
rpc/encoded? WS-X? Whats important to you?
...ant
On 3/22/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's great. Perhaps we could look at that as part of the Axis
"cleanup work" which needs to be done?
Jim
On Mar 22, 2006, at 1:59 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Jim,
Axis2+Sandesha has already been thru WS-Addressing Interop and WS-RM
Interop using both SOAP 1.1 and SOAP 1.2 (specifically with
Indigo/WCF).
thanks,
dims
On 3/22/06, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim,
4. Additional bindings to Axis through integration with Celtix,
particularly ws and JMS
- Basic integration (p1)
- Ability to retarget (p2)
- Dan, would Celtix get us Indigo interop?
Good question regarding the Indigo stuff. We do have Indigo
interop on
the roadmap, but I don't know the complete timetable or what that
really
means (since I know nothing about Indigo).
That said, post milestone 5 of Celtix (next week), we have someone
that
will be doing some interop testing using Celtix with Indigo to
test the
WS-RM, WS-A and SOAP (1.1 only for now) interoperability.
Obviously,
until the results of those tests come in, I don't know how far
away we
are.
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
