Jeremy You wan't to watch out. You might end up saying the whole programming model is just JavaBeans :-)
Paul On 4/7/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: > > Isn't this already allowed? I didn't think that the runtime actually > > forced you to implement your model extensions as interfaces + > > implementations... or are we talking about the best practice that we'd > > like to promote here? > > > > It works once SDO can use POJOs - before using SDO to load directly > would have required interfaces and codegen (hence the dual model we had). > > "Best" practice may be a bit strong - I'm really talking about > "good-enough" practice and balancing flexibility etc. vs. making it easy > for people to add their extensions to the model. > > I'm for making it easy for them and would suggest we simplify some of > the existing extensions so that they are easier to understand (e.g. by > converting them to using JavaBeans). > > -- > Jeremy > -- Paul Fremantle VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
