I agree, shorter names are more readable. I used shorter names for the JavaScript samples, have a look and see if thats better or you can suggest better names or structure: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/samples/JavaScript/
...ant On 4/7/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: > > [snip] > > ant elder wrote: > >> Thats what I'll start doing then, its easy enough to move them if > >> anyone has > >> a different suggestion. > >> > >> If they're separate projects must they really use the > >> org.apache.tuscany.samples.javascript... package names or could that be > >> something shorter? Some of those long names are quite hard to read in > >> the > >> scdl. > >> > >> > [snip] > > I've been wondering about that for the java samples as well. Currently > > we have very long package names like > > org.apache.tuscany.samples.bigbank.account.services.stockquote for > > example. I think it would be nicer if we could just have stockquote, > > or sample.stockquote. What do people think? > > > I was doing some tests with our samples today and bumped again into very > long package names like > org.apache.tuscany.samples.bigbank.account.services.stockquote. I would > like to make the package names in the samples shorter, something like > sample.stockquote. Any opinions? > > -- > Jean-Sebastien > >
