On 4/26/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip/> Ant, you -1 this stating that you weren't sure what this entails and
that it was buried in another email. Now that Dan pulled it out and included a description of what checkstyle is, do you have specific concerns about the proposal?
For the record yes I'm no longer -1. I do agree with Dan that having a consistent style does make code look better and makes it easier to understand. It does seem a bit odd that we looking at having bad style fail a build and checking this with every build but at the same time still don't test things that really matter like the samples. Another concern i have is I expect this will cause more build breaks - I'm fine with that, builds break - but right now people seem to be taking build breaks a bit more seriously than I'd like. ...ant
