To pick up on both these responses. On 12/05/06, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Geoff When you talk about string objects do you mean instances of the ANSI string class (basic_string) or is this a special SDO designed string class?
I didn't include enough detail. I meant a class that we will define that will be a wrapper (prety much) for the basic_string class.
Also why is this an either/or? It would seem like a useful thing to have an interface that allows string objects to be used but not sure I would want to loose the ability to use C strings as well.
You are right. It wasn't my intention to remove the existing interface. My question was whether to make the changes purely to the internals (so no user visible use of string objects at all) or to add (as you describe) additional methods that take string objects as arguments. On 12/05/06, Edward Slattery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FWIW I would think of creating an SDO string class which can be constructed from a char* or a std::string, and make the methods use the SDO string, such that either char* or std::string can be input.
Makes sense to me. I'll go that route. Geoff.
