[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-231?page=comments#action_12414785 ]
Brent Daniel commented on TUSCANY-231: -------------------------------------- We need to investigate some the architecture a bit before we can do this. Currently, a ResultDescriptor instance is scoped to a Command. If we move over completely to ResultDescriptor, users will have to use a CommandGroup with defined Commands to pass in a shape. This takes away the simple option of creating a Command directly and passing in an instance of ResultSetShape, and moves further towards a model where users have to specify a complex config file before they can accomplish simple tasks. Maybe this is OK, but we need to step back and decide if this is what we want. > Need to replace use of ResultSetShape with Config's ResultDescriptor > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: TUSCANY-231 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-231 > Project: Tuscany > Type: Improvement > Components: Java DAS RDB > Versions: Java-Mx > Reporter: Kevin Williams > Fix For: Java-Mx > > We need to convert to using the config-defined ResultDescriptor instead of > ResultSetShape for user provided result sahpe metadata. As part of this > effort, we should consider the impications of having this in the config > instance. My concern is that,currently, the config instance allows one > desriptor instance. This instance applies to all queries in the config which > may not be the best approach since COmmandGroups allow for multiple queries. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
