OK... as I need to start on this several days ago I'm going to produce
seeparate zips for SDO and SCA.


On 08/06/06, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 In the Tuscany C++ source tree we have a subproject for SDO and one for
SCA (which prereqs the SDO build). For a binary release should we combine
the build output into a single zip ro have a separate SDO zip?

If we do combine them we have a further option of the unzipped layout
having a separate structure for SDO and SCA:

 <unzipdir>/tuscany/sca/ (bin, include, samples etc.) <unzipdir>/tuscany/sdo/
(bin, include, samples etc.)

This is the way it is now and is the easiest to continue with but we could
combine the 2 into
<unzipdir>/tuscany/ (bin, include, samples etc.)

Any thoughts?

My personal preference is to keep them separate as the sdo could be used
standalone.

--
Pete




--
Pete

Reply via email to