Hi, Rania.
Thank you for pointing it out. I created this new document from the one for
M1 and forgot to remove the disclaimer.
I'm planning to incorporate Jim and Jeremy's presentation material into this
document and evolve it as the Tuscany Architecture Guide. Contributions and
comments are very welcome.
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rania Khalaf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: UML diagrams and a draft PDF document for the sandbox core are
uploaded to Tuscany Wiki
Hi guys,
Thanks for this document :)
You might want to remove the disclaimer at the end, at least the part that
says it reflects the M1 drop of the code. Unless I'm missing something:
this doc looks newer because M1 has JavaAtomicComponentContext and not
JavaAtomicComponent ...
On a side note, to make this kind of doc more useable it might be a good
idea to have an M1 version, and also a for changes since. Working versions
could then be versioned/stabilized with subsequent distributions. Would
also help people migrate their code as they develop for it.
thanks again!
Rania
Jim Marino wrote:
Great - thanks a bunch!
On Jun 7, 2006, at 10:19 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi, Jim.
The UML diagrams on the wiki page (http://wiki.apache.org/ws/
Tuscany/TuscanyJava/SandboxCore) are now updated to reflect your
changes.
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Marino"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 8:25 PM
Subject: Re: UML diagrams and a draft PDF document for the sandbox core
are uploaded to Tuscany Wiki
Thanks Raymond for taking this on. I have made to refactors today so
could you regenerate (I hope you didn't have to do the model by
hand)? The two basic changes I did are:
1. Rename ScopeContext to ScopeContainer since it "contains component
implementation instances"
2. Internalized InstanceWrapper (tracks implementation instance
lifecycle) to the scope container implementations. This means that
component type extensions will be able to implement one less class.
As part of this refactor, I also renamed PojoImplementationWrapper to
ImplementationWrapperImpl since it is generic and not specific to
POJOs.
Thanks,
Jim
On Jun 6, 2006, at 2:46 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I uploaded a draft PDF document together with a set of UML class
diagrams to Tuscany wiki @ http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/
TuscanyJava/SandboxCore.
Please note these documents are work in progress and not guaranteed
to be accurate and complete. They are produced based on my
understanding of the new core code developed by Jim and Jeremy in
the sandbox. It's subject to review and revision. I hope it will be
hopeful for you to understand the code.
Thanks,
Raymond
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
