In the C++ implementation you would only get a single property "implementation". It's type would be sca:JavaImplementation which is a sub type of Implemetation. I think this is correct as the schema tells us that when loading the instance document to treat " implementation.java" as "implementation" so you should not see a property named implementation.java.
possibly... On 14/06/06, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It seems that SDO models XSD substitution group as open content. So in this case, we have two properties: implementation and implementation.java. The DataObject.getXXX(Property) method works for both and returns the same value. And because of this, the code doesn't know if the implementation.java substitutes implementation. As a result, the vaule is incorrectly written twice into the XML stream. Thanks, Raymond ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeremy Boynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: < tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 9:43 AM Subject: Re: Question about XSD substitution support in SDO2 > On 6/14/06, Raymond Feng < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> By the SDO spec, the component Type (which owns the implementation >> substitution group) is open and there will be two properties: >> >> implementation: normal property in Type.getProperties() list >> implementation.java: dynamic property in >> DataObject.getInstanceProperties() >> list >> > > If the type was just open then yes. I thought the intent here though > was substitution so wouldn't that mean that the "implementation" > property should contain an "implementation.java" sub-type instance? > > -- > Jeremy > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Pete
