It may be easier just to replace it but if people prefer to have
license clarification, let me know and I will get it fixed. The
intent with the jar was not to have a proprietary license and was
probably an oversight in the Codehaus distro.
Jim
On Jul 18, 2006, at 10:46 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Jul 18, 2006, at 10:27 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
But the dependency we are currently using is not opensource, is
this right ?
In general we use the stax-api JAR from Codehaus for this; that
claims to be the RI and is open source.
I don't know where this dependency in bigbank is coming from. If we
are redistributing this jar we need to investigate the terms
associated with it to make sure we are complying. It may be easier
just to exclude it and replace it with stax-api.
Note these are also just the APIs - the StAX implementation we are
using is Woodstox (again from Codehaus) which is open source.
--
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
