Hi,
It seems that EasyMock is easier to understand and use. It takes a record
and play approach on the real methods. That's why I decided to get it a try.
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeremy Boynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 1:32 PM
Subject: jMock vs. EasyMock
In chianti we had started to play with jMock as a mock object test
framework but after living with it for a while I started to get
frustrated with it. I saw that Raymond's databinding framework was using
EasyMock and tried converting over one of the jMock testcases. It was
fairly simple to do and easymock lived up to its name.
I think we should pick just one framework and would suggest we that it's
easymock - does anyone have any other preference or comments?
--
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
