The site is not quite public yet (probably next week). If you are interested, could you send me your contact information offline and I will facilitate looking into this? Also, are you currently employed by one of the collaborating companies?

Jim


On Jul 19, 2006, at 10:17 PM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:

Hi... How do you get a membership at http://www.osoa.org.

- Venkat


On 7/19/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Right now Jeremy and I have been doing this as we are members of the
spec group as well. However, there is no reason others can't do this
as well. There will be a new OSOA website (mentioned by Raymond)
where issues can be raised directly so this may facilitate that process.

Jim


On Jul 19, 2006, at 9:59 AM, Yang ZHONG wrote:

> Is the spec group pulling proposals from Tuscany wiki?
> If not, maybe we need to push the proposals to the spec group and
> we may
> need a process.
>
>
> On 7/19/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 19, 2006, at 9:31 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > When we implement Tuscany, once a while we run into issues/ holes/ >> > missing features in the SCA spec (SDO in some cases). I'm wondering >> > if we have an open source endorsed process on how to deal with such >> > issues. Because they may impact the programming model (the way how
>> > users use SCA or SDO), I think we should be extra cautious on
>> > making decisions.
>> >
>> > Here're a list of things I can see:
>> >
>> > 1) Capture the requirement (problem statement)
>> > 2) Make proposals (could be more than one, maybe with prototypes in
>> > sandbox?)
>> > 3) Reach consenus in the community by discussions
>> > 4) Present the proposal to the spec group
>> > 5) Conclude if it will be become an official spec feature (if
>> > accepted by the spec group) or a tuscany-specific extension (we
>> > should use tuscany namespace to model SCDL extensions if required)
>> > 5) Make changes in the code base with an agreed solution
>> >
>> > I suggest that we keep track of them on the Tuscany wiki site.
>> >
>> > What do you guys think?
>>
>> Sounds good.
>>
>> I did something like this for the CDI proposal - there is a page on
>> the wiki at:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/SpecProposals
>>
>> --
>> Jeremy
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Yang ZHONG


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to