Right Simon, I guess David's picture is the one we must go forward with. Just that we must also give some thoughts to the 'distribution' and 'integration' aspects and see how we can express this. Chek my prev. mail on what I mean by this.
Thanks - Venkat On 7/20/06, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually I got a little confused here as we now have Davids top level diagram also. I have the source for that so I'll fiddle there a bit. What I want to do is get the diagrams in some kind of possition in the new website layout so we can see where they fit and whether the diagrams are appropriate. The details of the diagrams can of course still be changed going forward. S On 7/20/06, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Venkata > > I'm just making some changes to the overview diagram so that it covers > more than Java. Do you have the original source. What app did you use? Am > just making changes in a bit editor at the mo so I remember what I want but > would be good to do it properly. > > S > > > On 7/11/06, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Luciano, > > > > My sincere apologies. I left that out since I don't know much of the > > DAS landscape in Tuscany. However, I have now included that. Please let me > > what I have stated there sounds ok. > > > > Finally, I wish to again reiterate that the diagram that I have put in > > is just to trigger some ideas to what we might ultimately host on the > > web-site. For example I want to be able to position blocks that represent > > databindings, transport bindings and various containers. Right now all of > > it is bundled up. > > > > Thanks > > > > - Venkat > > > > > > > > On 7/11/06, Luciano Resende < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > Looking at this, we are missing DAS component, that would be well > > > represented as a parallel box (to the left) of SDO box. Could you > > > please add > > > that to the diagram you created ? > > > > > > > > > On 7/10/06, Venkata Krishnan < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > This is a vague mental map of Tuscany and not what I wish to put > > > in the > > > > site. This is just to trigger some perspectives to the what we can > > > present > > > > in the site. The level of aggregation is pretty high in this > > > diagram. I am > > > > sure we can explode the blocks a little further or position them > > > differently > > > > to provide a better picture of Tuscany. > > > > > > > > If not anything I hope to atleast correct what I am imagining of > > > Tuscany > > > > :-) > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Regards > > > > > > Luciano Resende > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > >
