On 7/20/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 20, 2006, at 11:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>  public class Launcher {
> +    // REVIEW: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Perhaps this should be
> null / have no default?
> +    // It seems to me it would very unusual (ie, uncommonly-
> simplistic) for the system classloader to be the desired
> +    // application loader, and we might be better off requiring it
> to be injected.

I would suggest we convert the launcher to a JavaBean and set these
values as properties. Using a JavaBean should make initialization
across classloaders easier.

+1, I'll take a cut at it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to