So right now sca doesn't define a groupId and is parented to tuscany-project w/ groupId o.a.t.. would this mean sca would continue to be parented to tuscany-project, but define a new groupId? What difference would this make? (I don't really get how maven treats this hierarchy to understand what the pros/cons are here)
On 7/21/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was fixing up the DAS pom's recently and noticed that the groupId was set to "org.apache.tuscany.das" which seemed quite sensible. What do people think about changing the groupIds for sca and sdo to o.a.t.sca and o.a.t.sdo respectively? -- Jeremy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
