Actually, the source is really just that
<img src ="/images/sca_composite.jpg" alt="SCA Composite"
usemap ="#scaMap" border="0" />
This is just one of those cases were the Anakia (Velocity?) processing
is messing things up. And it doesn't show up wrong in Mozillia FF only
MS IE.
BTW initially the usemap attribute was also just dropped.. had to
fiddle with it to preserve that attribute through the processing. It
looks like in this case also the alt attribute bit the dust.
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
The SCA diagram is not displayed correctly.
Please change the following section in sca-index.html:
From:
<img src="./images/sca_composite.jpg" width="" height="" align=""
usemap="#scaMap" />
To:
<img src="./images/sca_composite.jpg" border="0" usemap="#scaMap" />
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 6:35 AM
Subject: Re: Comparison between live tuscany website and what's being
proposed as part of Tuscany-568
I've added in the news, and moved reporting bugs as suggested, added
a link to the blog and fixed several bad links.
I didn't want the left menu to become cluttered, so I didn't put in
the runtime stuff since I was thinking that information would be
added to the individual Java, C++, DAS etc content pages.
I'm of a different opinion, I think we should now get this sandbox
site up live and use the opportunity that the OSCON BOF gives us to
get first hand feedback. What's the worse that can come of it ?
People don't like this either? Well should that be the case its best
to get that information now before we make it "absolutely perfect".
I'm really opposed to starting another effort of producing a hybrid
of the two in a mad dash which is not where we wanted to go in the
first place.
Luciano Resende wrote:
I took sometime today to evaluate what's available today on the live
tuscany
website and what's being proposed as part of Tuscany-568.
Looks like couple page links on the Tuscany-568 are still not
implemented (
e.g page not found), but I'm assuming these issues are going to be
fixed, so
I concentrate on areas that are available today and missing on the
new site
structure.
Categories:
Tuscany: Looks like the new proposed site gets rid of News and
Documentation
sections, and adds License, ASF, Javadoc and TCK
SCA Runtime for Java : Missing on the new site structure
SDO for Java : Missing on the new site structure
Relational Data Access Service for Java : Missing on the new site
structure
Sca Runtime for C++ : Missing on the new site structure
SDO for C++: Missing on the new site structure
Community: Reporting bugs moved to development (altough i think
comunity in
general is interested on this as well), Requirements missing,
Commiters and
Documentation section added
Development: Java project, C++ Project and Building the site
sections are
missing. Added Roadmap, Source code, Code standards (link to wiki),
Issue
tracking (moved from Comunity) and dependencies
As I think the main idea was to incorporate user feedback that our
website
had too many text and very little images, diagrams, etc I have the
following
suggestion to get a new and improved version on-line for OSCON
timeframe :
- Maintain the current website outline navigation structure (the one
available today on live tuscany website)
- Replace the main page with the one proposed on Tuscany-568
- Add an overview page for each module (e.g DAS overview with DAS
diagram
and high level object diagram), and the main page diagram would link
to this
module overview page
- On the SCA, SDO and DAS section on the left panel, remove the
"release"
link as they all point to same main download page.
With this, i think we could still get an improved version of the
site in a
short period of time, and then still continue on improvements later on.
- Luciano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
