On 7/24/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 21, 2006, at 3:25 PM, Raymond Feng wrote: > >> Several questions: >> >> 1) What's going to happen if a 3rd party dependency is not OSGi >> bundled? >> 2) How does it deal with "Require-Bundle"? It seems that it can >> populate "Import-Package" automatically. >> 3) Can you post a sample MANIFEST.MF generated by the plugin? > > Manifest-Version: 1.0 > Archiver-Version: Plexus Archiver > Created-By: Apache Maven > Built-By: jboynes > Build-Jdk: 1.5.0_06 > Extension-Name: sca-api-r0.95 > Specification-Title: API classes for the Service Component > Architecture > Specification-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation > Implementation-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation > Implementation-Title: sca-api-r0.95 > Implementation-Version: 1.0-SNAPSHOT > Export-Package: org.osoa.sca.annotations, org.osoa.sca > Bundle-Version: 1.0.SNAPSHOT > Bundle-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation > Bundle-Name: SCA API > Bundle-Classpath: . > Bundle-Localization: plugin > Bundle-Description: API classes for the Service Component Architecture > Bundle-SymbolicName: org.osoa.sca
i'm not an OSGI expert so i'll just comment on the java stuff. looks like the Specification-Version and the Implementation-Vendor-Id attributes are missing. both these attributes are recommended by Java specifications. IMHO it might be better to include tuscany in the implementation title but i don't think that the current manefest is uncomplient. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
