That sounds like an ineresting idea. I'll look into it.
Now that the release is out of the way I want to open up discussion on here about restructuring the C++ runtime to enable it to support multiple language bindings (C++, PHP,...) and also to support the latest Assembly Specification for the recursive model. I'm getting some thoughts together to kick this off. Cheers, On 02/08/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How about a C++ JavaScript extension to match the one we have in Java/SCA? You can use SpiderMonkey [1] which also has E4X support and then we'd be able to switch SCA JavaScript components btw the Java and C++ runtimes. Using E4X would mean you don't have the databinding issues when using web services as the data stays as XML, and you could show us how much faster your C++ runtime is compared to the Java one ;) [1] http://www.mozilla.org/js/spidermonkey/ ...ant (sorry a bit late replying but I'm still catching up on mail) On 7/21/06, Andrew Borley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I've been loosely thinking about what it will take to provide extra > language > bindings to Tuscany SCA C++ and how that relates to providing the runtime > as > an extension within a language. I've put my early thoughts up on the wiki > here: > http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/TuscanyCpp/LanguageBindingsAndRuntimes > > I guess with the new spec there will be quite a lot of changes, so this > may > all become redundant, but I was just thinking how I'd like to see Python > or > Ruby components running alongside C++ ones (and, of course, Java ones > too!) > :-) > > Cheers > Andy > >
-- Pete
