Folks, many thanks for the votes. How does it work now? I have a feeling my nominator might be expected to initiate a process or 2 to get me up and running as a committer, but Frank is now on vacation. If this is the case could I put myself up for adoption please ;-)
Regards, Kelvin. On 03/08/06, Kevin Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 from me too! Jim Marino wrote: > +1 from me - Welcome Kelvin. > > Jim > > On Aug 2, 2006, at 1:53 PM, Frank Budinsky wrote: > >> I'd like to propose that we make Kelvin a committer. Kelvin has made >> many >> contributions to the SDO project: >> >> - helped design -noEMF generator patterns and contributed tests for >> those >> patterns >> - provided SDO design and M1 user documentation on the WIKI >> - tested M1 release candidates >> - provided input to interop testing scenarios >> - discovered an EMF issue affecting SDO open content using global >> properties from xsds >> - designed and provided a patch for ChangeSummary on DataObject support >> - regularly participates in IRC and mailing list discussions >> - worked on the sdo part of the new Tuscany website >> - reviewed sample SDO code for M2 drop >> - almost completed a paper for JDJ on What is SDO? >> - ran a BOF at OSCon for SDO and Tuscany >> >> Here's my +1 for making Kelvin a committer. >> >> Frank. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Best Regards Kelvin Goodson
