It didn't seem apparent from the thread if this is in place or not.
Anyway, I think we should take a look at both, if possible, and pick
the one that best suits what we need to do. Also, we could have two
or more builds for testing things on different platforms. Let's see
if Raymond is looking into this further.
Jim
On Aug 6, 2006, at 3:03 AM, ant elder wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to use Continuum if possible as thats an Apache
project along with the Apache infrastructure instead of a BEA server?
There's been several mentions of doing this on incubator-general
recently,
eg [2], so it sounds like it is possible to do now.
Also, Raymond already started some work on setting up a Continuum
build,
[1], he's on holiday right now so could this wait till he's back
and we hear
where he has got to?
...ant
[1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=115074596300004&r=1&w=2
[2]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200604.mbox/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/6/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If there are no objections, I'm going to look into TeamCity (probably
not right away but soon) for continuous integration. Details are at:
http://www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/ .
The OpenJPA project is using TeamCity and Patrick Linksey gave it a
good review when I talked to him about their experiences with it.
Fortunately, we will likely be able to piggy-back off the machines
they are currently using (in a DMZ at BEA).
If anyone is interested in helping with this, please let me know.
Jim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
