The annotations are there to cope with the cases where, according to the SDO spec, we would create properties or types with "."s in. For example
<element name="interface.cpp" type="sca:CPPInterface" substitutionGroup="sca:interface" sdo:name="interfaceCpp"/> Without sdo:name= we would generate a property called "interface.cpp". I believe this causes problem when using XPath expressions. cheers, On 07/08/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I noticed some SDO annotations in the SCDL XSDs used by the C++ runtime. I'm working on the new SCDL XSDs representing the recursive composition model from the SCA 0.95 spec and wondering if we really need to add annotations to the XSDs again. Given that we are not generating code from these XSDs do we really need these SDO annotations? -- Jean-Sebastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Pete
