I really like that auto discovery of WSDL without having to explicitly have
anything pointing to it in the scdl. Didn't the really old Java code that
was first given to Apache work like this? I think Ken has also mentioned
that the JAXWS binding he's doing will work like that as well. Probably
there still needs to be a way to explicitly define this in the SCDL, i did
like the old import.wsdl way that the Java M1 code had, it was much nicer
than the tuscany-model.config we used to use and i think it makes things
clearer than having a wsdlLocation on the interface.wsdl or
biniding.wselements. Whatever we do we should try to keep this
consistent across the
Java and C++ runtimes.

  ...ant

On 8/11/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

<snip/>

As far as I know <include.wsdl> and <include.xsd> are not in the spec
yet. I'm actually thinking that placing the WSDL and XSD files in the
directory containing the application should be enough to indicate that
they should be used. In other words, no need to edit an XML file telling
the runtime that some WSDL and XSD files are there, the runtime should
be smart enough to just scan and find them...

--
Jean-Sebastien


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to