I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to say? The JavaDoc for TargetInvoker.clone says "Implementations must support deep cloning".
...ant On 8/11/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Aug 11, 2006, at 7:36 AM, ant elder wrote: > I did wonder about this, doesn't it need to be a deep copy? I don't > really > understand the purpose of cacheable, but if its set on the one > instance > shouldn't it be also set on the clone? And do subclasses need to > copy their > fields? Say the RMI binding was using this abstract class should it > setting > the remoteMethod field on the clone? http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/lang/Object.html#clone() And remember deep copy only applies to mutable objects -- Jeremy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
