So basically, we have an "application" component in "tuscany.root" composite
and the component is implemented by the composite represented by the SCDL.
Right?
Here's the hierarchy I figured out from the debugger. Please confirm.
tuscany.runtime --- tuscany.system
--- tuscany.system
--- (all the extension components)
--- RuntimeInfo
--- tuscany.root
--- application (implemented by a composite
provided by the user application)
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeremy Boynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 11:15 AM
Subject: Re: Name for the application composite?
Yes, the name in the attribute is the name of the composite not the name
for the component.
The "application" name is only used by the launcher as it, by design,
only deploys a single application; it would be possible to derive the
name somehow e.g. from the file name. If you look at the servlet version
it uses the name of the webapp as the name for the component.
--
Jeremy
On Aug 14, 2006, at 10:59 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that when we deploy an application, the corresponding name for
the CompositeComponent is hard-coded as "application" rather than loaded
from the name attribute in the SCDL file. Is it by design?
Thanks,
Raymond
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
