Hi,

- I will add it to the SCDL in the <binding.rmi>
- The exception seems to be related to the Axis2 Binding jar that gets
packed into the extension directory of a standalone distribution.  I removed
it for now, and have things working all right.
- I have not included a testcase that exposes a RMI service and a reference
that makes use of this.  The testcase works, as before only in eclipse.  The
maven build fails when the tests are executed.  I will see if I can figure
out something after which I will seek your help to get over this :-)

Thanks.

- Venkat

On 8/15/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Aug 14, 2006, at 10:41 PM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:

> Hi Jim / Jeremy,
> I have been able to go forward quite a bit.

Cool

> - Which is the scdl into which I must add the RMIHost component.  I
> added it
> first to the system.scdl in SCA-API project.  But that did not get
> picked up
> by the loader.  When I debugged I figured out that it was the
> system.scdl in
> the SCA-Test project that was being loaded for system components.
> So added
> it there and it did get picked up.  Is this right?  There is
> something that
> I am missing here.. where should I be adding this component actually.

I would suggest adding it to the SCDL in the <binding.rmi> extension
- this would only be activated if the RMI binding extension was active.

> - I have added 'Module' scope for the RMIHostImpl and have the
> eager init
> decoration as well.
>
> - I have added the autowire annotations to the constructor of the
> RMIBindingBuilder.
>
> When I run, the RMIHostImpl is picked up and injected into the
> builder.  But
> then I have having some strange exceptions in the DirectoryScanner
> and in
> the creation of the target invoker. I shall work to get over this
> and see if
> I can post a patch tonight.

What exceptions (can't help if we don't know :-) )?
--
Jeremy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to