Yes, my suggestion was going to be to the SDO groupId to be changed to " org.apache.tuscany.sdo"... but i don't think it's a big deal, I was just curious if there was any guidelines or not...
On 8/15/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Aug 15, 2006, at 7:51 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > I was working on DAS distribution and notices various components > use various > "standards" for groupId and artifactId (e.g DAS use different > grouping the > SDO, etc) > > I was just wondering if we have any guidelines on how to group sub- > projects > by groupId and artifcatId in POM files ? DAS is currently using its own groupId "org.apache.tuscany.das" - this seems reasonable, were you thinking of changing it? I would instead suggest changing SDO to "org.apache.tuscany.sdo" would be better. -- Jeremy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- ----------------------------------------------------- Luciano Resende SOA Opensource - Apache Tuscany -----------------------------------------------------
