On Aug 17, 2006, at 12:02 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Yep, you're right. However, to have a ReferenceDefinition with a
reference target but not a binding, I would have to create a new
spi.model class. Unless it has a big impact on, for instance, the
loader code, it would be nice if we could say that a
ReferenceDefinition _can_ have a target URI but it does not have
to. I have not delved into the loader code enough to tell whether
its worth the class savings. So let me know whether you think it
would or would not work.
I'd prefer to try the extra class route first since having things
that are valid in one context but not another on the same class can
lead to trouble.
Jim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
