Pete,
Sounds good to me, I'll definately be interested in reviewing if you have
something to show before tomorrow (Friday) afternoon (I'm on holiday for the
week after that). The Python stuff I've been doing will need fitting in to
the structure you've put together, so I'd be interested in seeing the
interfaces you're making for the CPP extension.
Once that's in place I guess we'll start looking at binding and interface
extensions, and then there's wiring policies, data bindings, etc, etc to
look at!

Cheers
Andy

On 8/17/06, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I've started playing around with loading extension libraries to support
"other language" extensions and so a wee bit of re-architecture has "cpp"
being an extension language. In other words I'm trying to make a core that
is not tied to cpp implementation. This core will roughly be a model
loader
in line with the assembly model spec with extensions for stuff like <
implementation.cpp.. > and a runtime for resolving wiring and locating
services. This is nearly what we have now but without the cpp C&I spec api
implmentation code (anything under runtime/core/src/osoa...).

This will involve a bit of refactoring to remove the unnecessary
dependencies from the "core" to the cpp specific code.

What I expect to end up with is libraries for:
tuscany_sca - the core assembly model and internal message structure
tuscany_sca_cpp - the cpp language extension (extension functions for
loading cpp model etc.)
tuscany_sca_cpp_osoa - the "client" side functions defined by the C++ C&I
spec (ComponentContext etc.)

I'm not yet sure if the latter 2 should be the same library, that will
depend on their interdependencies.

This is not a trivial change and it's tricky to break it down into
sensible
small chunks so I may start a branch/sandbox to play in for the
moment...or
if it suddenly all works I'll get it checked in to the trunk asap ;-)

It's nearly there but will probably take another day or maybe 2 and it
would
probably be good for anyone else interested in the cpp code to review it.
It
won't be near perfect but it will provide a good base for a more modular
and
extensible runtime.

Cheers,


Reply via email to