On 8/25/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip/>
More importantly, if we are trying to make the use case of a
>> single reference used by a J2SE client easier, I'd would say don't
>> use SCA for that. Just use Axis (or some other transport)
>> directly. Where SCA is valuable is in assembly of multiple services.
>>
>
> I'm not sure :-) I think it should also be possible for these guys
> to take advantage of SCA (I assume SCA can simplify programming).
>
SCA doesn't simplify all programming. Sometimes it's just easier to
avoid the unnecessary overhead of "frameworks".
Could this be an interesting scenario to support which may appeal to people
like those using the old WSIF framework? Advertising this and documenting a
migration path from WSIF to the SCA programming model could get us a bunch
of new users who may not otherwise be looking at SCA.
...ant
