Doesn't the QName alone provide enough information? I mean, why do we
need the full type definition, isn't it enough just to know the
required type?
--
Jeremy
On Aug 28, 2006, at 1:46 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I ran into an issue when I try to introspect a WSDL portType to
create the WSDLServiceContract: We don't have the XML schema
information referenced by the WSDL.
We use WSDL4J to load WSDL files to resolve WSDL related metadata
such as PortType. As you know, a WSDL part in a message is usually
typed by either a XSD type or element. How do we resolve these XSD
references? Do we need a databinding-independent model such as
XmlSchema (from Apache ws-commons: http://ws.apache.org/commons/
XmlSchema/) or should we leave it to the specific DataBinding
extension (for example, SDO can resolve it using XSDHelper)?
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Raymond
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
