Hi,
Did we conclude that we will rename the artifact ids as I proposed? If
there's no objections, I'll make the changes.
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 2:28 AM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Add "tuscany-" as the prefix for our artifact ids
+1
Rick also suggested this a while back, maybe we should raise a JIRA this
time so its not forgotten.
...ant
On 8/25/06, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Here is a list of JARs we're building:
axis2-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
spring-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
celtix-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
groovy-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
rmi-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
api-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
core-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
spi-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
wsdl-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
Don't we think the name of the jars are misleading? Can we tell these
jars
from tuscany project? The groupId makes them unique for the maven
repository
but it seems to be wierd when we copy these jars into some folders.
I propose that we restore the naming convention we had in M1: add
"tuscany-"
as a prefix to the artifactId.
Do you agree?
Thanks,
Raymond
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
