On Friday September 01 2006 11:26 am, Jeremy Boynes wrote: > On Sep 1, 2006, at 7:49 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > Jeremy, > > > > I need to bring up something else: the version numbers.... > > > > According to the latest discussions on the general list, the > > version numbers > > for the incubator projects MUST be of the form: > > > > #[.#]*-incubator[-M#][-SNAPSHOT] > > > > prior to deploying to even the snapshot server. I notice that > > the numbers > > in the tuscany poms don't meet that requirement. > > I hadn't read it that way - I figure you're generally nuts to be > relying on a snapshot anyway and if you've made a decision to use one > you have a pretty clear understanding about whether a project is > incubating or not. For releases, it's another thing.
I've chatted with Jason about this a couple times. The basic opinion is that ANYTHING that goes off of your personal PC and into a "public" space MUST be clearly delineated as being an incubator podling. For maven artifacts, that involves the version number (or group ID, but generally the version number is better). Someone just browsing the snapshot repository should clearly see that these jars are incubating. > > My suggestion is the parent pom gets: > > 1-incubator-SNAPSHOT > > > > and the rest get: > > 1.0-incubator-M2-SNAPSHOT > > Which raises the question, what do we want to call this release - > 1.0, 1.0-alpha, 1.0-M2, 0.9? I'd like to shoot for 1.0 but that might > be optimistic :-) Now THAT'S a good question. I'd go either: 1.0-incubator-M2 or 1.0-incubator-alpha Enjoy! -- J. Daniel Kulp Principal Engineer IONA P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 F:781-902-8001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
