Jean-Sebastian,
By an odd coincidence I'm currently looking at a list iterator bug in SDO
that is exposed when I build against the stdcxx library rather than the
standard Microsoft one. Is thsi issue urgent? If possible I'd like to
re-visit your case after I've resolved the stdcxx one (hopefully later
today) By then I might understand it all :-)
On 07/09/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
[snip]
> I just tried it and was able to import our VC7 solution into it. I ran
> into two issues:
> - A minor issue, I had to remove the ODBC libraries from the link
> configuration
> - A more serious issue, the SDO runtime breaks with exceptions
> complaining about "incompatible list iterators" in
> DataObjectImpl::~DataObjectImpl()
>
> This is probably easy to fix - although I have no idea how to fix it :)
>
Geoff,
Here's the Exception and call stack I'm getting from sdo_test on
Windows, built with VC++ Express 2005:
msvcp80d.dll!104f9961()
[Frames below may be incorrect and/or missing, no symbols loaded
for msvcp80d.dll]
>
tuscany_sdo.dll!std::list<commonj::sdo::rdo,std::allocator<commonj::sdo::rdo>
>::_Const_iterator<1>::_Compat(const
std::list<commonj::sdo::rdo,std::allocator<commonj::sdo::rdo>
>::_Const_iterator<1> & _Right={first=3452816845 second={...} }) Line
309 + 0x17 bytes C++
tuscany_sdo.dll!std::list<commonj::sdo::rdo,std::allocator<commonj::sdo::rdo>
>::_Const_iterator<1>::operator==(const
std::list<commonj::sdo::rdo,std::allocator<commonj::sdo::rdo>
>::_Const_iterator<1> & _Right={first=3452816845 second={...} }) Line
290 C++
tuscany_sdo.dll!commonj::sdo::DataObjectImpl::~DataObjectImpl()
Line 4564 + 0x37 bytes C++
tuscany_sdo.dll!commonj::sdo::DataObjectImpl::`scalar deleting
destructor'() + 0x2b bytes C++
tuscany_sdo.dll!commonj::sdo::RefCountingObject::releaseRef() Line
69 + 0x4c bytes C++
sdo_test.exe!commonj::sdo::RefCountingPointer<commonj::sdo::DataObject>::~RefCountingPointer<commonj::sdo::DataObject>()
Line 133 + 0x15 bytes C++
sdo_test.exe!sdotest::scopetest() Line 69 + 0x19 bytes C++
sdo_test.exe!main(int argc=1, char * * argv=0x00386018) Line 48 +
0x5 bytes C++
sdo_test.exe!__tmainCRTStartup() Line 586 + 0x19 bytes C
sdo_test.exe!mainCRTStartup() Line 403 C
The exception is raised in list.cpp - line 309:
#if _HAS_ITERATOR_DEBUGGING
void _Compat(const _Myt_iter& _Right) const
{ // test for compatible iterator pair
if (this->_Mycont == 0 || this->_Mycont != _Right._Mycont)
{
_DEBUG_ERROR("list iterators incompatible"); <---- There
_SCL_SECURE_TRAITS_INVALID_ARGUMENT;
}
}
This is called from DataObjectImpl::~DataObjectImpl():
PropertyValueMap::iterator i = PropertyValues.begin();
while (i != PropertyValues.end())
{
unset((*i).first);
if (i == PropertyValues.begin()) <-- There
{
// unset has not removed the item from the list - do it
// here instead
PropertyValues.erase(i);
}
i = PropertyValues.begin();
}
And I am a little puzzled by the code in the above loop... Although I
didn't spend much time trying to grasp the logic here, and I have not
been playing with C++ iterators too much lately, my experience is that
removing entries from a collection that you're iterating on is usually a
sure way to shoot yourself in the foot :) so I may be wrong but I sense
a bug somewhere in this loop...
Could you please take a look and see if there's a quick fix for this?
Thanks.
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
